Meta updated its commercial terms of use with language stating the company could "use any content from [a business account's] domains, web pages, or URLs to provide, develop, improve, research, train, and maintain the integrity of" Meta products and services. Legal experts consulted by Nieman Lab flagged this as a remarkable provision that appeared to grant Meta broad permission to scrape publisher websites and feed that content into AI training pipelines. The language sparked immediate concern given Meta's ongoing legal battles over alleged copyright infringement in AI development, even as the company defeated a high-profile lawsuit on these grounds last year.
Meta initially pushed back against interpretations of the updated terms, with a company spokesperson asserting that the provision did not represent any actual change in how Meta crawls the web. The statement emphasized that the language was clarifying existing policy rather than introducing new authority. After public scrutiny intensified, Meta took action to resolve the controversy.
Meta removed the disputed provision entirely from its terms of service. In a follow-up statement, the company clarified that the crawling terms it had consolidated applied only to its ads and business products and restated that the removal did not alter Meta's actual web-crawling practices. The company framed the move as responding to user feedback and seeking to eliminate ambiguity in its legal language. The removal marks an attempt to de-escalate tensions around AI training data sourcing, a practice that remains contested across the tech industry as publishers, authors, and regulators scrutinize how major platforms obtain and use content.
Gist is a free AI reader for your browser, iPhone, and Android. Get concise summaries and key takeaways from any article or podcast.
Get Gist — Free