FT Weekend Print Delivery Premium Digital Subscription Offering

**India's Ambition to Build a Homegrown Semiconductor Industry**

India has embarked on one of the most consequential industrial bets in its modern economic history: attempting to construct a domestic semiconductor manufacturing ecosystem largely from scratch. For decades, the country remained on the sidelines of the global chip race, watching Taiwan, South Korea, and later China pour hundreds of billions of dollars into fabrication plants, materials research, and chip design infrastructure. Now, driven by a mixture of geopolitical urgency and economic ambition, New Delhi is deploying significant state capital to change that calculus — with the Indian government committing roughly $10 billion in incentives under its semiconductor mission to attract chipmakers and lure back the diaspora of Indian engineers who have long powered Silicon Valley.

The timing is not accidental. The COVID-19 pandemic exposed the fragility of global semiconductor supply chains in ways that rattled governments worldwide, from Detroit automakers unable to source chips for new vehicles to consumer electronics manufacturers watching finished goods pile up in warehouses. For India, which imports virtually all of its semiconductors, the vulnerability was acute. Prime Minister Narendra Modi's administration has framed semiconductor self-sufficiency as a matter of national security as much as industrial policy, a framing that resonates in an era when Washington and Beijing are openly weaponizing chip technology against each other through export controls and blacklists.

The most prominent early commitment came from Tata Group, the sprawling Indian conglomerate, which announced plans to build a chip fabrication plant in Gujarat in partnership with Taiwan's Powerchip Semiconductor Manufacturing Corp. Separately, the US-based firm Micron Technology committed to building an assembly and testing facility in the same state, drawing on Indian government subsidies covering a substantial portion of capital costs. These announcements generated enormous political fanfare but also raised hard questions from industry analysts: can India realistically attract leading-edge fabrication, or will it be limited to the less glamorous — and less strategically decisive — back-end of chip manufacturing, namely assembly, packaging, and testing?

**The Structural Obstacles That Could Derail the Dream**

The enthusiasm surrounding India's semiconductor push runs headlong into a set of structural challenges that have stymied previous industrial ambitions. Water is perhaps the least discussed but most immediately binding constraint. Modern chip fabrication plants are extraordinarily water-intensive operations, consuming millions of gallons per day for ultrapure-water rinsing processes that must maintain near-perfect chemical purity. India's water infrastructure, already stressed by agricultural demand and erratic monsoon patterns, struggles to provide the reliability and quality that advanced fabs require. Site selection in India has repeatedly had to balance land availability against proximity to adequate water sources, an equation that has no easy solution in a country where water rights are politically explosive.

Power reliability presents a parallel problem. Semiconductor fabrication cannot tolerate electricity outages measured even in fractions of a second — a single flicker can destroy an entire batch of wafers mid-process, representing millions of dollars in losses. India's grid, while improving, still suffers from quality and reliability issues that would require chipmakers to invest heavily in on-site backup generation and power conditioning equipment, adding substantially to capital costs that are already among the highest of any industrial undertaking on earth.

Then there is the talent question. India produces an enormous number of engineering graduates each year, and Indian-origin engineers hold senior positions throughout the global semiconductor industry. But there is a meaningful difference between having diaspora talent abroad and having a dense local ecosystem of experienced process engineers, equipment specialists, and materials scientists who can staff a fab and troubleshoot the relentless technical problems that arise in high-volume chip manufacturing. Taiwan's TSMC advantage is not simply its machinery — it is decades of accumulated tacit knowledge embedded in a workforce that has grown up inside the industry. India is attempting to compress that learning curve through training partnerships and by enticing experienced engineers to return, but the timeline is measured in years, not months.

**Geopolitics as Both Engine and Complication**

The geopolitical dynamics accelerating India's semiconductor ambitions are the same ones creating complications. Washington has actively encouraged allied and partner nations to build alternative chip supply chains outside China's sphere, and India has positioned itself as a natural beneficiary of that realignment. Senior US officials have made semiconductor cooperation a talking point in bilateral meetings, and the US-India Initiative on Critical and Emerging Technology, known as iCET, explicitly identifies semiconductors as a priority domain. Applied Materials and Lam Research, two of the dominant American suppliers of chip manufacturing equipment, have been engaged in discussions about expanding their footprint in India.

Yet India's traditional foreign policy instinct toward strategic autonomy creates friction with the kind of deep integration that semiconductor partnerships require. Chipmaking is not a transaction — it demands long-term technology-sharing relationships, the movement of sensitive equipment, and embedding foreign engineers inside Indian facilities for years. India's bureaucratic and regulatory environment, while improving under reform efforts, still generates uncertainty that gives global chipmakers pause. Lengthy approvals, land acquisition challenges, and inconsistent application of industrial policy have burned foreign investors in other sectors, and semiconductor executives are acutely aware of those precedents.

China's own trajectory looms over every calculation. Beijing has spent an estimated $150 billion or more in state subsidies attempting to build a world-class chip industry, and while it has made real progress at legacy nodes, it remains years behind at the cutting edge despite those investments. India is watching that cautionary data point carefully — enormous state spending does not automatically translate into technological competence — while simultaneously hoping that its democratic governance, English-language proficiency, and alignment with Western technology ecosystems give it advantages China could not replicate.

**What Success Would Actually Require**

The realistic near-term scenario for India involves becoming a significant hub for chip packaging, testing, and assembly — activities that are growing in strategic importance as advanced packaging techniques like chiplets and 3D stacking become central to performance gains at the frontier. This is not a consolation prize: the packaging segment is increasingly where differentiation happens, and countries that build strength there will have meaningful leverage in the supply chain. But it is categorically different from leading-edge wafer fabrication, which remains concentrated in Taiwan and South Korea for reasons that took decades to develop.

For India to move beyond back-end assembly toward genuine fab capability, it would need sustained policy commitment across multiple election cycles, infrastructure investment that goes far beyond chip-specific subsidies to address power and water at a systemic level, and a willingness to absorb the losses and learning that inevitably accompany industrial catch-up. The window created by global supply chain anxiety and US-China decoupling is real but not permanent — other locations including Vietnam, Japan, and the European Union are competing for the same investment flows. India's semiconductor bet is serious, consequential, and genuinely uncertain in its outcome.