Financial Times subscription and digital offerings overview

**The Geopolitics of Global Currency Reserves**

The United States dollar's dominance as the world's reserve currency has defined international finance for nearly eight decades, underpinning everything from oil pricing to sovereign debt issuance. That dominance, however, is facing its most sustained period of scrutiny in a generation. Central banks across emerging markets and even some developed economies have been quietly diversifying their reserve holdings away from dollar-denominated assets, a trend that accelerated sharply after the United States and its allies froze roughly $300 billion in Russian central bank assets following the 2022 invasion of Ukraine. The message that seizure sent to governments worldwide — that dollar reserves could become a geopolitical weapon — has reshaped how finance ministers and central bankers think about vulnerability and sovereignty.

Gold has been the primary beneficiary of this rethinking. Central bank gold purchases hit record levels in 2022 and 2023, with institutions in China, Poland, Singapore, and several Gulf states adding substantially to their holdings. The People's Bank of China alone added gold for 18 consecutive months through mid-2024. Meanwhile, the share of global reserves held in dollars has slipped from around 71 percent two decades ago to roughly 58 percent today, according to IMF data — a meaningful erosion even if the dollar retains a commanding lead over rivals like the euro, yen, and renminbi.

**The Dollar's Structural Advantages Remain Formidable**

Despite the headlines about de-dollarization, the structural forces keeping the dollar at the center of global finance remain deeply entrenched. The United States Treasury market is the largest, most liquid sovereign debt market on earth, with over $25 trillion in outstanding securities and daily trading volumes that dwarf any competitor. When financial stress strikes — as it did in March 2020 at the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic — investors flee toward dollars, not away from them. That safe-haven dynamic reinforces itself: the more the dollar is used in crises, the more institutions hold dollars in anticipation of future crises.

The network effects of dollar dominance are similarly self-reinforcing. Roughly 88 percent of all foreign exchange transactions involve the dollar on one side of the trade, according to the Bank for International Settlements. Commodities from oil to soybeans to copper are priced and settled in dollars globally, meaning exporters and importers alike must hold dollars to conduct ordinary business. The SWIFT messaging network, though not dollar-specific, is deeply integrated with dollar-clearing infrastructure centered on correspondent banking relationships in New York. Building a credible alternative to that architecture is not a matter of political will alone — it requires decades of institutional development, deep capital markets, and a legal system that investors trust to protect their assets.

The euro's limitations illustrate this point sharply. Despite representing a $17 trillion economy and having been in existence for a quarter century, the euro accounts for only around 20 percent of global reserves. The absence of a unified European safe asset — a genuine euro-area bond backed collectively by all member states — leaves the euro zone without the deep, homogenous debt market that makes Treasuries so attractive to reserve managers.

**China's Challenge and Its Limits**

China has made the internationalization of the renminbi a stated strategic priority for over a decade, and it has made measurable but ultimately modest progress. The renminbi's share of global reserves has risen from near zero to roughly 2.3 percent. Cross-border renminbi settlement has expanded, particularly with trading partners in Southeast Asia, the Middle East, and Africa. The CIPS payment system, China's alternative to dollar-clearing infrastructure, has grown its network of participating institutions. And bilateral agreements to settle trade in local currencies — including deals between China and Brazil, Saudi Arabia, and Russia — have drawn significant attention.

Yet the renminbi faces a fundamental constraint that no political agreement can easily override: China maintains strict capital controls that limit the free flow of money in and out of the country. Reserve managers need to be able to sell their holdings quickly and at scale without moving the market; that requires an open capital account and deep secondary markets, neither of which China currently provides. The Communist Party's overriding priority on financial stability and control of the exchange rate is fundamentally in tension with the openness required for a true reserve currency. Until Beijing is willing to accept the discipline — and vulnerability — that comes with a fully open capital account, the renminbi's reserve role will remain structurally capped.

**What a Fragmented System Would Mean**

The more plausible near-term scenario is not a sudden displacement of the dollar but a gradual fragmentation of the international monetary system into regional currency blocs. Trade within the BRICS grouping increasingly settles in local currencies. Gulf states experiment with non-dollar pricing for some energy transactions. Digital currency initiatives — including central bank digital currencies being developed by China, the European Central Bank, and others — could eventually enable faster bilateral settlement that bypasses traditional dollar-clearing channels.

This fragmentation carries real costs for the global economy. A less unified monetary system is likely to be a more expensive one, with higher transaction costs, more currency risk, and reduced efficiency in capital allocation across borders. The United States itself would lose the so-called exorbitant privilege — the ability to borrow cheaply in its own currency and run persistent current account deficits — that dollar dominance confers. For emerging markets caught between competing currency blocs, the transition period could be particularly volatile, as reserve managers scramble to calibrate holdings across a more complex landscape. The dollar's twilight, if it comes at all, is likely to be long, slow, and considerably messier than either its critics or its defenders tend to anticipate.